From 44c13aad4de51fc0d30992f5dccb053669fa29d6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Tim Redfern <tim@herge.(none)>
Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2013 12:16:12 +0100
Subject: timed pixelcorps version of alpha_merge is faster than openCV

---
 rotord/cvimage.cpp | 7 +++----
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

(limited to 'rotord/cvimage.cpp')

diff --git a/rotord/cvimage.cpp b/rotord/cvimage.cpp
index ca094d3..cb10fdd 100644
--- a/rotord/cvimage.cpp
+++ b/rotord/cvimage.cpp
@@ -33,8 +33,8 @@ namespace Rotor {
 		}
 		return *this;
 	}
-	//THESE CAN BE OPTIMISED - LOOK INTO USING OPENCV HERE
-	Image & Image::alpha_blend(const Image &other) {
+	//THIS OPENCV VERSION IS SLOWER THAN THE OLDSKOOL VERSION BELOW
+	Image & Image::alpha_blend_cv(const Image &other) {
 		if (other.w!=w||other.h!=h) {
 			cerr<<"Rotor: cannot blend images with different sizes! (wanted "<<w<<"x"<<h<<", got "<<other.w<<"x"<<other.h<<")"<<endl;
 			//why not??
@@ -67,7 +67,7 @@ namespace Rotor {
 
 		return *this;
 	}
-	Image & Image::alpha_blend_old(const Image &other) {
+	Image & Image::alpha_blend(const Image &other) {
 		if (other.w!=w||other.h!=h) {
 			cerr<<"Rotor: cannot blend images with different sizes! (wanted "<<w<<"x"<<h<<", got "<<other.w<<"x"<<other.h<<")"<<endl;
 			//why not??
@@ -77,7 +77,6 @@ namespace Rotor {
 			rgb=other.rgb.clone();
 		}
 		else {
-			rgb+=other.rgb;
 			for (int i=0;i<w*h*3;i++) {
 				rgb.data[i]=(uint8_t)(((((int)rgb.data[i])*(0xFF-other.alpha.data[i/3]))>>8)+((((int)other.rgb.data[i])*((int)other.alpha.data[i/3]))>>8));
 			}
-- 
cgit v1.2.3